Sharp analysis. The refund clause turning into litigation futures is wild becuase it shows how financialization can create real-time checks on executive overreach that courts might take years to resolve. I worked adjacent to trade compliance, and the idea of firms buying refund rights at 20-30 cents on the dollar basically means markets are pricing presidential authority failure at 70-80%. The Cantor Fitzgerald angle makes it even weirder when thefinancial sector shorts policies its own affiliates enforce.
Sharp analysis. The refund clause turning into litigation futures is wild becuase it shows how financialization can create real-time checks on executive overreach that courts might take years to resolve. I worked adjacent to trade compliance, and the idea of firms buying refund rights at 20-30 cents on the dollar basically means markets are pricing presidential authority failure at 70-80%. The Cantor Fitzgerald angle makes it even weirder when thefinancial sector shorts policies its own affiliates enforce.
Thanks for bringing this to light
How to increase heart rate before the last work call of the year: