The Boutique Hotel Edition
On evolution, shared experiences, and micro-hospitality
Colin here. If you think back to the original wave of boutique hotels, they were pretty revolutionary. Instead of the cookie-cutter lodging that an American traveler was used to, a wave of entrepreneurs created beautiful jewel boxes with personality and sensibility. The movement started in the early 1980s and grew from one-offs to micro chains, to an eventual spot in the mainstream consciousness. People like Ian Schrager and Steve Rubell (Morgans), Chip Conley (Joie de Vivre), Liz Lambert (Bunkhouse), Alex Calderwood (Ace), and countless others brought visions to life in ways that felt hyper-vivid—almost like living in a magazine, where no detail, scent, or texture was left to chance.
And the inspiration didn’t always come from lodging, it came from porting the glamour of after-hours activities into another context. Instead of a lobby, a bed, and a shower, it was a vibe. According to a Skift deep dive on the topic:
Schrager and Rubell were intent on elevating the allure and magic they had perfected in their nightclubs and bringing them directly into their hotel lobbies and bars. This is where boutique hotels as we know them today got their start.
We’re now in a boutique glut: there are still great ones, but there are also larger brands trying to emulate the boutique ethos and coming off not-quite-sincere in the process. Sometimes it can feel as if a focus group of what Gen Z wants was magically manifested into a physical structure. Every booking.com search surely turns up a hastily renovated motor inn made to look Instagrammable, with a nightly rate commensurate to the number of like you can expect.
Why is this interesting?
We can see the dead-end in terms of the cookie-cutter-ification of boutique hotels. But what could a new equation look like? A member of the WITI Slack pointed out this really cool example of the thesis called The Courts. It’s a small-footprint boutique property with a few rooms in the form of trailers. What separates it from the rest of what’s out there is its focus on tennis. The micro-resort, if you will, gathers around a shared activity with four tennis courts, complete with a clubhouse and pool. It takes the boutique model but then adds a reason to gather or invite a bunch of friends.
In another realm, I was also intrigued by how a friend of WITI designed this incredible “Cookhouse” Airbnb. Instead of just positioning it to the market as a cool place to stay, they mapped their positioning to an interest: cooking. The value proposition is clear, and the spot is filled to the brim with amazing appliances and everything you need to try out your best (or most complicated!) recipe.
The equation that seems to work here is smart design and worldview plus shared interest or activity. Also, these types of interesting places don’t need to be large-scale bets with huge investors. The Courts, in fact, seem to be the work of a small agency that occupies the property. Similar to the roots of boutique hotels, they are labors of love that can cover their costs and turn a profit in time. Post-COVID, I’m intrigued by the possibilities of these kinds of micro-resorts that can reshape small group travel in new ways. (CJN)
I love me some 2x2s. This time Quartz takes a pass on examining the history of the venerable diagram. (NRB)
Yesterday’s WITI on Information Theory turned into a long conversation about information as the basis of the universe. Here’s science writer John Horgan refuting that idea. (NRB)
Oldie but goodie: Kevin Kelly on scenius, or the communal form of genius. (NRB)
Thanks for reading,
Noah (NRB) & Colin (CJN)
Why is this interesting? is a daily email from Noah Brier & Colin Nagy (and friends!) about interesting things. If you’ve enjoyed this edition, please consider forwarding it to a friend. If you’re reading it for the first time, consider subscribing (it’s free!).